Bitcoin traded in the $80,000s on Dec. 31 just as U.S. inflation cooled and investors priced Federal Reserve rate cuts.
The lack of follow-through has left traders leaning less on macro headlines and more on a mix of real yields, money-market plumbing, and spot ETF flows. That shift is keeping price action pinned to defined levels even when “cuts are coming” dominates the narrative.
Macro without the Boom: Why “Good News” isn’t moving Bitcoin
The latest inflation data reinforced that narrative on paper.
Headline CPI rose 2.7% from a year earlier in November, and core CPI rose 2.6%.
But the print also arrived with a credibility problem, making it easier for markets to treat the release as confirmation rather than new information.
Data disruptions tied to a government shutdown affected collection and timing. That included a canceled October CPI and a November collection delayed into a period with holiday discounting effects.
Policy is also delivering mixed reinforcement rather than a clean risk-on impulse.
The fed funds target range sits at 3.50–3.75% after a third cut in 2025.
The December Summary of Economic Projections pointed to a median of one cut in 2026, with wide dispersion, according to the Federal Reserve.
For traders who want the market’s current odds rather than the Fed’s projections, CME Group’s FedWatch remains the standard reference point.
The gap between implied probabilities and policymakers’ center of gravity is part of why “cuts” alone have not been enough to lift Bitcoin out of its range.
The constraint is visible in the discount rate that matters most for duration-style assets: real yields.
The 10-year TIPS real yield was around 1.90% in late December.
When real yields hold near that level, easier nominal policy can coexist with tight real financial conditions. That can limit the upside traders often expect from rate cuts.
Put differently, markets can celebrate “cuts” while Bitcoin waits for the combination that tends to matter more: lower real yields and a cleaner liquidity impulse that reaches marginal buyers.
Why rate cuts alone haven’t been enough to unlock Bitcoin’s next leg higher
Liquidity conditions have also looked less straightforward than the easing narrative implies, especially around year-end.
Usage of the New York Fed’s Standing Repo Facility hit a record $74.6 billion on Dec. 31, while reverse repo balances also rose at year-end.
That mix can read as “liquidity is available” without reading as “liquidity is effortless,” a distinction that matters for leveraged risk positioning.
The mechanics behind this type of stress are not only about the Fed’s policy rate. They also reflect balance sheet capacity and cash movements such as swings in the Treasury General Account, which the Federal Reserve has outlined as a channel that can drain or add reserves independent of the headline policy stance.
Fed balance sheet levels, tracked weekly via FRED’s WALCL, remain a reference point for investors looking for confirmation that liquidity is loosening in a way that can support sustained risk-taking.
At the same time, Bitcoin’s price behavior has been consistent with a flow-and-positioning regime rather than a headline-chasing one.
Glassnode described a defined zone, with rejection near about $93,000 and support near about $81,000. That framing suggests a range-driven market as overhead supply is absorbed, according to Glassnode Insights.
Reuters also noted Bitcoin trading around the high $80,000s into late December, well below its October peak. That reinforced the idea that macro optimism has not translated into immediate upside.
How ETF-driven flows reshaped Bitcoin’s price response to macro news
The post-ETF market structure helps explain why the reaction function has changed.
Spot Bitcoin ETFs inserted a large, visible flow channel between macro sentiment and spot buying pressure. That channel can mute the impact of “good news” when demand is weak or net selling dominates.
There have been around $3.4 billion of net outflows from U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs since Nov. 4, with IBIT leading the outflows.
The underlying daily series is tracked by Farside Investors. The day-to-day pattern matters because a string of positive creations can provide steady spot demand even when macro is noisy, while persistent red days can cap rallies that would have extended in a pre-ETF market.
| Driver | Latest reference point | Why it matters for BTC |
|---|---|---|
| Inflation | Nov. CPI 2.7% YoY, core 2.6% YoY (BLS) | Supports “cuts” narrative, but quality caveats can limit repricing (Reuters) |
| Real yields | 10-year TIPS real yield ~1.90% (FRED DFII10) | Keeps the discount rate restrictive even if nominal cuts are priced |
| Liquidity plumbing | SRF usage record $74.6 billion on Dec. 31 (Reuters) | Signals localized tightness that can restrain leverage and risk appetite |
| ETF flows | ~$3.4 billion net outflows since Nov. 4 (ETF Database; Farside) | Weakens the marginal bid that often drives breakouts |
| Market structure | Support ~$81,000, resistance ~$93,000 (Glassnode) | Sets the near-term “battlefield” where catalysts need follow-through |
That setup leaves traders watching for confirmation that macro easing is translating into the specific inputs Bitcoin has been reacting to.
What needs to change for Bitcoin to break out of its macro range
One path is a base case where rate cuts remain priced, inflation prints stay disputed, and real yields hold firm. That could keep Bitcoin inside the $81,000–$93,000 zone Glassnode flagged.
Another path requires the checklist investors keep returning to: a downtrend in the 10-year real yield, a sustained turn in daily spot ETF creations, and a clean move through overhead supply near the upper end of the range.
For investors mapping broader cross-market inputs into early 2026, the dollar has remained part of the backdrop rather than a standalone catalyst.
The greenback started 2026 on a softer footing after its largest annual drop in eight years.
In prior cycles, a weaker dollar has been a classic tailwind. This time, it has not been sufficient to overwhelm the combined drag of elevated real yields and ETF outflows.
In that sense, Bitcoin is behaving less like a pure reaction to “good news” and more like an asset waiting for measurable transmission through rates, funding markets, and the ETF flow channel that now sits between macro and spot demand.
The post Why “good news” hasn’t been moving Bitcoin recently: Macro without the boom appeared first on CryptoSlate.
